TV Timeout

“Oops, I did it again…”
On a recent appearance on Larry King Live, Al Gore was asked by a caller, ” …what issues caused by climate change globally are likely to affect the United States security in the next 10 years?”
As usual, the former next President, didn’t let the facts get in the way of a good story. Gore responded:
You know, even a one-meter increase, even a three-foot increase in sea level would cause tens of millions of climate refugees.
If Greenland were to break up and slip into the sea or West Antarctica, or half of either and half of both, it would be a 20-feet increase, and that would lead to more than 450 million climate refugees.
The direct impacts on the U.S. have already begun. Today, 49 percent of America is in conditions of drought or near drought. And we have had droughts in the past, but the odds of serious droughts increase when the average temperatures go up, as they have been going up.
We have fires in California, in Florida, in other states, unprecedented fire season last year, directly correlated with higher temperatures, which dry out the soils, dry out the vegetation.
We have a very serious threat of losing enough soil moisture in a hotter world that agriculture here in the United States would be greatly affected. Now, the list is too long to give you here, but look, these issues are more important that Anna Nicole Smith and Paris Hilton, and they are not being talked about.
We agree with Gore that the issue of climate change is more important than Paris Hilton. What size popcorn I’m going to get when I go to the movies is more important than Paris Hilton.
Author Patrick Michaels, however, points out that there are at least three other factual problems with Gore’s answer:
FACT 1. There is not one shred of evidence in the refereed scientific literature speaking of a three-foot increase in sea level in ten years. The best estimates from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change range from 0.8 to 1.7 inches.
FACT 2. There is no trend towards increasing drought area in the United States that is related to planetary warming. We have good data on drought area back to 1895. The correlation between the area of the U.S. under drought and planetary temperature is statistically ZERO.FACT 3. As the mean planetary temperature has warmed since 1975, U.S. crop yields have increased significantly, just as they did during the period of cooling from 1945 through 1975, or during the warming from 1910 to 1945.
I so badly want to suggest that this story should be filed under “once a politician, always a politician” … but I won’t.
global warming, climate change, Al Gore, Larry King, Patrick Michaels, drought, famine, pestilence, Paris Hilton




June 22nd, 2007 at 11:50 am
[...] Efron Link to Article paris hilton TV Timeout » Posted at Environmental Talk on Friday, June 22, [...]
June 22nd, 2007 at 12:04 pm
[...] Clark Link to Article al gore TV Timeout » Posted at Environmental Talk on Friday, June 22, 2007 [...]
June 23rd, 2007 at 1:35 am
LOL… I love it! I will always remember him on the cover of that magazine (was it Times, Newsweek? People?) with that big junk in the trunk. Vice presidency, presidential nominee, film producer, environmentalist, and all I get is that picture in my head. Love your sharp wit.
June 24th, 2007 at 8:29 am
“The best estimates from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change range from 0.8 to 1.7 inches.”
You are very correct on this point and Al Gore seems to keep exaggerating when it comes to this issue, especially in his documentary. I have some interesting articles on global warming both pro and against on my site.
I remain a constant skeptic about what any politician has to say.
June 28th, 2007 at 9:10 am
“I remain a constant skeptic about what any politician has to say”
EXACTLY. Politicians irk me.
Mark - I saw Al Gore’s movie a while back and it basically scared the crap outta me. I love your P.O.V. because it shows another side. Could you possibly tell me what you think about the movie and if there were exaggerations reported?
June 28th, 2007 at 1:04 pm
If it’s okay, Lyndsey, I’m going to try to answer your question in an extended couple of posts over the next couple of days…
Hope you find it interesting and informative.