Insecurity Counsel

Security issue? Sure, throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks . . .
First, it was a scientific issue. Then, it was a moral issue. Now, it’s a security issue. If there is a danger to be exaggerated, you can be pretty sure that, sooner or later, somebody will try to connect it to global warming.
We can all sleep better knowing that the U.N. is on the case and treating global warming as a security issue. The organization that has raised the phrase “U.N.-designated safe haven” to iconic oxymoron status, is holding hearings on the implications of climate change on world peace.
I wouldn’t trust the U.N. to pick up my mail if I went away for a long weekend . . . but I’m supposed to believe the group that screwed up so spectacularly in Bosnia and pretty much crapped the bed on the entire continent of Africa will be able to handle this issue?
China’s deputy ambassador, Liu Zhenmin, summed the whole thing up nicely when he said, “. . . the Security Council has neither the professional competence in handling climate change — nor is it the right decision-making place for extensive participation . . .”
You know you’re in trouble when you find yourself nodding along in agreement with the representative from communist China.
If global warming is a threat to world peace, does that mean if by some chance the planet cools over the next 50 years that we’ll be looking forward to a golden age of tolerance and tranquility?
I didn’t think so.
global warming, climate change, China, Africa, UN, United Nations, Security Council, security, security issue



November 21st, 2007 at 11:34 am
[...] If you’ve been a regular reader of this blog (and why wouldn’t you be?), you’ll know I haven’t always been a big fan of the United Nations. [...]